QQH vs VOO
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $706M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.19% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 93 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.11% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.76% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.34% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Howard Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 9, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQH vs VOO Performance
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is a ETF from Howard Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQH returned +18.69% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, QQH is up 12.11% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, QQH compounded at +22.76% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.34% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQH has the edge at +19.87% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for QQH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQH charges 0.98% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $3 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQH currently yields 0.19% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQH and VOO share 86 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQH or VOO?
QQH has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQH or VOO?
Over the past year QQH returned +18.69% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQH annualized +19.87% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQH or VOO?
QQH has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQH -41.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQH and VOO?
QQH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQH and VOO?
QQH and VOO share 86 common holdings with a 38.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQH or VOO?
QQH yields 0.19% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.