QQQ vs RDVI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RDVI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RDVI is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RDVI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $3.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 7.89% |
| Holdings | 107 | 73 |
| YTD Return | +16.87%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +22.98%Best | +16.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.98%Best | +17.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.39% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -18.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $27,217Best | $19,617 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 23.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 19, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.9 years).
QQQ vs RDVI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RDVI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% while RDVI returned +16.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.87% versus a gain of 11.03% for RDVI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.98% per year against +17.89% for RDVI. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +29.27% annualized vs +18.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.9% for RDVI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -18.4% for RDVI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RDVI charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $75 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 7.89% for RDVI.
Holdings Overlap
42.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings RDVI also owns. 33.2% of RDVI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RDVI, against full books of 107 and 73.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for RDVI that do not appear in our book for QQQ (65.7% of the fund), and 76 for QQQ that do not appear in RDVI (54.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RDVI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.44% | 2.10% | 6.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 1.57% | 5.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.76% | 1.96% | 3.80% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.51% | 2.92% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.36% | 2.01% | 1.35% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.86% | 2.96% | 1.10% |
| LRCXLam Research Corpcommon Stock | 1.69% | 3.06% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.78% | 1.52% | 1.26% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.84% | 1.74% | 0.10% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 1.11% | 2.40% | 1.29% |
42.3% of QQQ is already inside RDVI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RDVI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RDVI charges 0.75%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RDVI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.98% vs +16.55% for RDVI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +29.27% vs +18.86% for RDVI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RDVI?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.9% for RDVI. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs RDVI -18.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RDVI?
QQQ and RDVI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RDVI?
42.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings RDVI also owns. 33.2% of RDVI's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RDVI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RDVI?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RDVI yields 7.89%, so RDVI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RDVI better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RDVI is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.