QQQ vs RVRB
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Reverb ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RVRB?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. RVRB is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RVRB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 107 | 499 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -19.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $22,203Best | $17,218 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 38.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Reverb ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 3, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 183 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QQQ has data through Sep 25, 2026 and RVRB through Mar 26, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2022 to Mar 26, 2026 (3.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 12.9% for RVRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $30 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
91.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 50.8% of RVRB's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside RVRB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026 and RVRB as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
85 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 493 in RVRB, against full books of 107 and 499.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 363 positions for RVRB that do not appear in our book for QQQ (45.5% of the fund), and 13 for QQQ that do not appear in RVRB (6.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RVRB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 6.78% | 1.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 5.40% | 1.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 5.92% | 0.16% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 6.28% | 2.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 4.24% | 0.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.52% | 0.64% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.66% | 3.77% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 2.13% | 0.65% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.56% | 1.93% | 0.63% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 0.61% | 2.84% |
91.9% of QQQ is already inside RVRB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RVRB charges 0.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 12.9% for RVRB. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RVRB?
QQQ and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RVRB?
91.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings RVRB also owns. 50.8% of RVRB's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 493 in RVRB.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so RVRB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RVRB better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. RVRB is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.