QQQ vs RVRB
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Reverb ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. RVRB offers more diversification with 499 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RVRB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $5M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.86% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 499 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | -5.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +14.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +19.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -19.1% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Reverb ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 3, 2022 |
QQQ vs RVRB Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Reverb ETF (RVRB) is a ETF from Reverb ETF. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while RVRB returned +14.03%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a loss of 5.46% for RVRB.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +19.00% for RVRB. Across the full 3-year window we track, RVRB has the edge at +17.33% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.9% for RVRB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -19.1% for RVRB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RVRB charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $30 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.86% for RVRB.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RVRB share 85 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RVRB charges 0.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RVRB?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +14.03% for RVRB, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +17.33% for RVRB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.9% for RVRB. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RVRB -19.1%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RVRB?
QQQ and RVRB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RVRB?
QQQ and RVRB share 85 common holdings with a 47.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RVRB?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RVRB yields 0.86%, so RVRB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.