QQQ vs SCHI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHI has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SCHI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $455.8B | $11.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 5.02% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 2,316 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | -0.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.75% | +2.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.25% | +6.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.39% | +0.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 7.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -20.7% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Oct 10, 2019 |
QQQ vs SCHI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% while SCHI returned +2.11%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.68% versus a loss of 0.37% for SCHI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.25% per year against +6.02% for SCHI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.39% and +0.71% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.6% for SCHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -20.7% for SCHI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SCHI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 5.02% for SCHI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SCHI share 0 holdings out of 109 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SCHI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCHI charges 0.03%. SCHI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SCHI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.75% vs +2.11% for SCHI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.15% vs +1.51% for SCHI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SCHI?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.6% for SCHI. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SCHI -20.7%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SCHI?
QQQ and SCHI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SCHI?
QQQ and SCHI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 109 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SCHI?
QQQ yields 0.41% while SCHI yields 5.02%, so SCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.