SCHI vs VYM
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SCHI or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
SCHI has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHI | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.04% |
| AUM | $11.4B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 2,329 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -1.85% | +11.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.27% | +16.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +17.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.37% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.6%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,186 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 10, 2019 to Sep 16, 2026 (6.9 years).
SCHI vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
SCHI vs VYM Performance
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCHI returned -1.27% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, SCHI is down 1.85% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Over three years, SCHI compounded at +5.57% per year against +17.24% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.37% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +11.71% annualized vs +1.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 7.6% for SCHI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for SCHI and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHI charges 0.03% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $4 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHI currently yields 5.12% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 77.3% of VYM's money is in holdings SCHI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SCHI, our book for it covers 25.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VYM is already inside SCHI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
243 positions in common, counted across the 530 positions we hold weights for in SCHI and 557 in VYM, against full books of 2,329 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHI | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.13% | 7.35% | 7.22% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.21% | 3.82% | 3.61% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.06% | 2.51% | 2.45% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.11% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.14% | 1.80% | 1.66% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.09% | 1.52% | 1.43% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.08% | 1.50% | 1.42% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.06% | 1.48% | 1.42% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.08% | 1.34% | 1.26% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.04% | 1.37% | 1.33% |
77.3% of VYM is already inside SCHI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHI or VYM?
SCHI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VYM charges 0.04%. SCHI is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHI or VYM?
Over the past year SCHI returned -1.27% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SCHI annualized +1.27% vs +11.71% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 7.6% for SCHI. Worst drawdown: SCHI -20.7% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both SCHI and VYM?
SCHI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHI and VYM?
At least 77.3% of VYM's money is in holdings SCHI also owns. Our book for SCHI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 243 positions in common, counted across the 530 positions we hold weights for in SCHI and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHI or VYM?
SCHI yields 5.12% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SCHI?
SCHI has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.