QQQ vs SPMO

QQQ vs SPMO

Which is better, QQQ or SPMO?

Each has led over a different period.

SPMO has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SPMO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.4%.

Lower Fees: SPMOHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQSPMO
Expense Ratio0.18%0.13%Best
AUM$486.1B$22.1B
Dividend Yield0.44%0.73%
Holdings107101
YTD Return+17.33%+23.72%Best
1Y Return+26.50%+28.60%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+24.58%+37.10%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+14.15%+19.52%Best
Volatility (annualized)18.7%17.5%Best
Max Drawdown-35.1%-31.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$19,381$24,390Best
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best51.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Oct 9, 2015

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2015 to Sep 3, 2026 (10.9 years).

QQQ vs SPMO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.9 years both funds cover.

QQQ vs SPMO Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +26.50% while SPMO returned +28.60%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.33% versus a gain of 23.72% for SPMO.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.58% per year against +37.10% for SPMO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.15% and +19.52% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +19.47% annualized vs +18.23%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 17.5% for SPMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -31.3% for SPMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SPMO charges 0.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $13 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.73% for SPMO.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in SPMO42.1%
SPMO already in QQQ59.9%

42.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings SPMO also owns. 59.9% of SPMO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 100 in SPMO, against full books of 107 and 101.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 102 and 100 positions we hold weights for.

QQQ holds 74 positions SPMO does not, 55.5% of the fund.

Largest: AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, META 2.78%, TSLA 2.56%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in SPMODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.8.44%8.45%0.01%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%9.81%5.38%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%7.06%3.90%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A3.36%4.75%1.39%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%4.14%0.69%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C3.13%3.78%0.65%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity1.69%3.51%1.82%
INTCIntel Corporation2.23%2.58%0.35%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares2.10%2.03%0.07%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.86%2.14%0.28%

59.9% of SPMO is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQSPMO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPMO?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SPMO charges 0.13%. SPMO is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or SPMO?

Over the past year QQQ returned +26.50% vs +28.60% for SPMO, so SPMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QQQ annualized +19.47% vs +18.23% for SPMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or SPMO?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 17.5% for SPMO. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SPMO -31.3%.

Should I hold both QQQ and SPMO?

QQQ and SPMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SPMO?

59.9% of SPMO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 59.9% of SPMO's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 100 in SPMO.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SPMO?

QQQ yields 0.44% while SPMO yields 0.73%, so SPMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPMO better than QQQ?

SPMO has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over the full window, SPMO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.