QQQ vs SROI
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SROI offers more diversification with 126 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SROI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $19M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.55% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 126 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +12.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +19.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +15.56% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -15.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Calamos Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Feb 3, 2023 |
QQQ vs SROI Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is a ETF from Calamos Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while SROI returned +19.34%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 12.54% for SROI.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +15.56% for SROI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SROI has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.3% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -15.9% for SROI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SROI charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $95 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.55% for SROI.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SROI share 22 holdings out of 199 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SROI?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SROI charges 0.95%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SROI?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +19.34% for SROI, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +13.48% for SROI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SROI?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.3% for SROI. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SROI -15.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SROI?
QQQ and SROI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SROI?
QQQ and SROI share 22 common holdings with a 28.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 199 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SROI?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SROI yields 0.55%, so SROI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.