IVV vs SROI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SROI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $19M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 126 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +11.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +17.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +15.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Calamos Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 3, 2023 |
IVV vs SROI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is a ETF from Calamos Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while SROI returned +17.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 11.96% for SROI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +15.29% for SROI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SROI has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.9% for SROI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SROI charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.55% for SROI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SROI share 54 holdings out of 570 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SROI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SROI charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SROI?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +17.36% for SROI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +13.35% for SROI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SROI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for SROI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SROI -15.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SROI?
IVV and SROI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SROI?
IVV and SROI share 54 common holdings with a 31.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 570 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SROI?
IVV yields 1.10% while SROI yields 0.55%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.