IVV vs SROI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
Which is better, IVV or SROI?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SROI is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SROI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $19M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 508 | 126 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +9.40% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +14.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +14.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -15.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $19,423Best | $15,222 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 31.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Calamos Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 3, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 6, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.6 years).
IVV vs SROI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SROI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is an ETF from Calamos Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SROI returned +14.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 9.40% for SROI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +14.10% for SROI. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +20.25% annualized vs +12.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 12.3% for SROI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -15.9% for SROI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SROI charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.53% for SROI.
Holdings Overlap
43.5% of IVV's money is in holdings SROI also owns. 55.8% of SROI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
55 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 120 in SROI, against full books of 508 and 126.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for SROI that do not appear in our book for IVV (3.8% of the fund), and 440 for IVV that do not appear in SROI (55.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SROI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 4.78% | 3.20% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.86% | 3.67% | 3.19% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 4.01% | 1.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 5.96% | 2.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 2.69% | 1.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 2.02% | 0.96% |
| VVisa Inc | 0.92% | 1.60% | 0.68% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.39% | 1.12% | 0.27% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.64% | 1.79% | 1.15% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.32% | 1.09% | 0.77% |
55.8% of SROI is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SROI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SROI charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SROI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +14.09% for SROI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +20.25% vs +12.38% for SROI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SROI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 12.3% for SROI. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SROI -15.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and SROI?
IVV and SROI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SROI?
55.8% of SROI's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 55.8% of SROI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 120 in SROI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SROI?
IVV yields 1.06% while SROI yields 0.53%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SROI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. SROI is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.