QQQ vs TGLR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TGLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $39M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.76% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 32 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | +10.88% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | +22.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +20.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -19.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Wedbush Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 13, 2026 |
QQQ vs TGLR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is a ETF from Wedbush Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while TGLR returned +22.36%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a gain of 10.88% for TGLR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +20.63% for TGLR. Across the full 3-year window we track, TGLR has the edge at +20.63% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.8% for TGLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -19.8% for TGLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TGLR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.76% for TGLR.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TGLR share 10 holdings out of 125 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TGLR charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TGLR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs +22.36% for TGLR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +20.63% for TGLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.8% for TGLR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TGLR -19.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TGLR?
QQQ and TGLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TGLR?
QQQ and TGLR share 10 common holdings with a 23.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TGLR yields 0.76%, so TGLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.