QQQ vs TGLR
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TGLR?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TGLR is less concentrated, with 43.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TGLR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $37M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.76% |
| Holdings | 107 | 33 |
| YTD Return | +15.94%Best | +8.13% |
| 1Y Return | +20.44%Best | +12.70% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.86%Best | +19.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.26% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -19.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $19,470Best | $16,920 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 43.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Wedbush Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 13, 2026 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2023 to Sep 14, 2026 (3 years).
QQQ vs TGLR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs TGLR Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is an ETF from Wedbush Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% while TGLR returned +12.70%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a gain of 8.13% for TGLR.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +24.86% per year against +19.67% for TGLR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 12.8% for TGLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -19.8% for TGLR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TGLR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.76% for TGLR.
Holdings Overlap
43.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings TGLR also owns. 38.0% of TGLR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 32 in TGLR, against full books of 107 and 33.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 19 positions for TGLR that do not appear in our book for QQQ (57.6% of the fund), and 85 for QQQ that do not appear in TGLR (53.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in TGLR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 3.42% | 5.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 4.73% | 1.03% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 3.03% | 4.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 2.72% | 1.95% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 4.11% | 0.95% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 3.42% | 0.06% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.69% | 4.76% | 3.07% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.41% | 3.70% | 1.29% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.10% | 3.66% | 1.56% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.08% | 3.35% |
43.8% of QQQ is already inside TGLR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TGLR charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or TGLR?
Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% vs +12.70% for TGLR, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 12.8% for TGLR. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs TGLR -19.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TGLR?
QQQ and TGLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TGLR?
43.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings TGLR also owns. 38.0% of TGLR's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 32 in TGLR.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TGLR?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TGLR yields 0.76%, so TGLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TGLR better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. TGLR is less concentrated, with 43.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.