QQQ vs THMZ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
Which is better, QQQ or THMZ?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | THMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $483.5B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 107 | 62 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +3.91% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77%Best | +7.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 14.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -16.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $16,823Best | $13,580 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 31.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Lazard Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Apr 4, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).
QQQ vs THMZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs THMZ Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while THMZ returned +7.00%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 3.91% for THMZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 14.4% for THMZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -16.0% for THMZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while THMZ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.23% for THMZ.
Holdings Overlap
49.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings THMZ also owns. 31.3% of THMZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 61 in THMZ, against full books of 107 and 62.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for THMZ that do not appear in our book for QQQ (28.4% of the fund), and 81 for QQQ that do not appear in THMZ (48.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in THMZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 3.07% | 5.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 3.65% | 2.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 2.12% | 5.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 3.70% | 0.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 3.30% | 0.06% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 0.89% | 3.54% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.14% | 1.02% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.86% | 3.32% | 1.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 2.38% | 0.40% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 1.47% | 1.98% |
49.0% of QQQ is already inside THMZ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or THMZ?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while THMZ charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or THMZ?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +7.00% for THMZ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +45.00% vs +24.43% for THMZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or THMZ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 14.4% for THMZ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -12.0% vs THMZ -16.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and THMZ?
QQQ and THMZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and THMZ?
49.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings THMZ also owns. 31.3% of THMZ's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 61 in THMZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or THMZ?
QQQ yields 0.44% while THMZ yields 0.23%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THMZ better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. THMZ is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.