IVV vs THMZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | THMZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.23% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 66 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +5.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +12.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Lazard Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 4, 2025 |
IVV vs THMZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is a ETF from Lazard Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while THMZ returned +12.15%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 5.64% for THMZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for THMZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.0% for THMZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while THMZ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.23% for THMZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and THMZ share 30 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or THMZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while THMZ charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or THMZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +12.15% for THMZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +27.55% for THMZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or THMZ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for THMZ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs THMZ -16.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and THMZ?
IVV and THMZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and THMZ?
IVV and THMZ share 30 common holdings with a 27.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or THMZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while THMZ yields 0.23%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.