QQQ vs TUG
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TUG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $34M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.01% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +16.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +26.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +21.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 16.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -22.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Gateway Credit Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | May 18, 2022 |
QQQ vs TUG Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) is a ETF from Gateway Credit Partners. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while TUG returned +26.71%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 16.67% for TUG.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +21.59% for TUG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TUG has the edge at +17.95% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.5% for TUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -22.3% for TUG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TUG charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.01% for TUG.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and TUG share 93 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 90.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TUG?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TUG charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or TUG?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +26.71% for TUG, so TUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +17.95% for TUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or TUG?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.5% for TUG. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs TUG -22.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and TUG?
QQQ and TUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TUG?
QQQ and TUG share 93 common holdings with a 90.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TUG?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TUG yields 2.01%, so TUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.