QQQ vs VEGN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs US Vegan Climate ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VEGN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VEGN offers more diversification with 263 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | VEGN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $189M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.52% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 263 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +25.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +36.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +26.45% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | +14.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 20.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -34.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Beyond Invesing | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Sep 9, 2019 |
QQQ vs VEGN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) is a ETF from Beyond Invesing. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while VEGN returned +36.96%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 25.93% for VEGN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +26.45% for VEGN; over five years the annualized figures are +14.78% and +14.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VEGN has the edge at +18.03% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.8% for VEGN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -34.4% for VEGN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VEGN charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $60 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.52% for VEGN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and VEGN share 6 holdings out of 117 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VEGN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VEGN charges 0.60%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or VEGN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +36.96% for VEGN, so VEGN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +18.03% for VEGN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or VEGN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.8% for VEGN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs VEGN -34.4%.
Should I hold both QQQ and VEGN?
QQQ and VEGN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VEGN?
QQQ and VEGN share 6 common holdings with a 11.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 117 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VEGN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while VEGN yields 0.52%, so VEGN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.