QQQ vs XSPI

QQQ vs XSPI

Which is better, QQQ or XSPI?

Large Cap Growth against Multi Alternative.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. XSPI is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: XSPI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQXSPI
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.98%
AUM$483.5B$116M
Dividend Yield0.44%9.60%
Holdings107509
YTD Return+15.94%Best+9.34%
1Y Return+20.44%-
3Y Return (annualized)+24.86%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.26%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%38.2%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)NEOS
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap GrowthMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 10, 1999Feb 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs XSPI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs XSPI Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a gain of 9.34% for XSPI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while XSPI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $98 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 9.60% for XSPI.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in XSPI94.4%
XSPI already in QQQ53.6%

94.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings XSPI also owns. 53.6% of XSPI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

Most of QQQ is already inside XSPI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

86 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 496 in XSPI, against full books of 107 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 403 positions for XSPI that do not appear in our book for QQQ (42.4% of the fund), and 10 for QQQ that do not appear in XSPI (3.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in XSPIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%8.19%0.25%
AAPLApple, Inc7.27%7.16%0.11%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%5.78%0.02%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%3.91%0.76%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.36%3.05%0.31%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%1.60%2.83%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%2.67%0.49%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%2.42%0.71%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%1.88%0.90%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%1.14%2.31%

94.4% of QQQ is already inside XSPI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQXSPI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or XSPI?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while XSPI charges 0.98%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and XSPI?

94.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings XSPI also owns. 53.6% of XSPI's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 496 in XSPI.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or XSPI?

QQQ yields 0.44% while XSPI yields 9.60%, so XSPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XSPI better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. XSPI is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.