IVV vs XSPI

IVV vs XSPI

Which is better, IVV or XSPI?

Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVXSPI
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.98%
AUM$876.4B$116M
Dividend Yield1.06%9.60%
Holdings508509
YTD Return+12.39%Best+11.61%
1Y Return+16.61%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%Best38.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)NEOS
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendMulti Alternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Feb 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs XSPI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs XSPI Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF (XSPI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 11.61% for XSPI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while XSPI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $98 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 9.60% for XSPI.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in XSPI98.1%
XSPI already in IVV95.0%

98.1% of IVV's money is in holdings XSPI also owns. 95.0% of XSPI's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of IVV is already inside XSPI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

474 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 496 in XSPI, against full books of 508 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 19 positions for XSPI that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.0% of the fund), and 9 for IVV that do not appear in XSPI (0.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in XSPIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.07%8.19%0.12%
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%7.16%0.14%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%5.78%0.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.84%3.91%0.07%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%3.05%0.05%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%2.67%0.02%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.39%2.42%0.03%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.90%1.88%0.02%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%1.60%0.03%
TSLATesla Inc1.56%1.56%0.00%

98.1% of IVV is already inside XSPI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVXSPI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or XSPI?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSPI charges 0.98%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $95 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XSPI?

98.1% of IVV's money is in holdings XSPI also owns. 95.0% of XSPI's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 474 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 496 in XSPI.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XSPI?

IVV yields 1.06% while XSPI yields 9.60%, so XSPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XSPI better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.