QQQH vs VOO
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $387M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.95% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.71% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.00% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.60% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.74% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QQQH vs VOO Performance
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is a ETF from NEOS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQH returned +13.00% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QQQH is up 6.71% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QQQH compounded at +19.60% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.74% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.2% for QQQH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.2% for QQQH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQH charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQH currently yields 9.95% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QQQH and VOO share 87 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 54.0% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQH or VOO?
QQQH has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQH or VOO?
Over the past year QQQH returned +13.00% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQH annualized +8.53% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQH or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.2% for QQQH. Worst drawdown: QQQH -31.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQQH and VOO?
QQQH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQH and VOO?
QQQH and VOO share 87 common holdings with a 54.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQH or VOO?
QQQH yields 9.95% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QQQH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.