QQQH vs VOO
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQQH or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $378M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 9.72% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 107 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.06% | +11.48%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.13% | +15.94%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.94% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.69% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1%Best | 16.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.2%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,484 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 20, 2019 to Sep 15, 2026 (6.7 years).
QQQH vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.7 years both funds cover.
QQQH vs VOO Performance
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is an ETF from NEOS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQQH returned +9.13% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, QQQH is up 6.06% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, QQQH compounded at +18.94% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.69% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.84% annualized vs +8.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 13.1% for QQQH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.2% for QQQH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQH charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQH currently yields 9.72% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
93.7% of QQQH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.3% of VOO's money is in holdings QQQH also owns.
Most of QQQH is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
84 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQH and 494 in VOO, against full books of 107 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 403 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQQH (45.9% of the fund), and 12 for QQQH that do not appear in VOO (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQH | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.59% | 7.55% | 1.04% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.51% | 7.05% | 0.46% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.98% | 5.36% | 0.62% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.53% | 4.13% | 0.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.18% | 3.24% | 0.06% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.82% | 1.44% | 3.38% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.83% | 2.86% | 0.03% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.95% | 2.62% | 0.33% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.42% | 1.21% | 2.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.68% | 1.90% | 0.78% |
93.7% of QQQH is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQH or VOO?
QQQH has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQH or VOO?
Over the past year QQQH returned +9.13% vs +15.94% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), QQQH annualized +8.34% vs +14.84% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQH or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 13.1% for QQQH. Worst drawdown: QQQH -31.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QQQH and VOO?
QQQH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQH and VOO?
93.7% of QQQH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.3% of VOO's is in holdings QQQH also owns. They hold 84 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQH and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQH or VOO?
QQQH yields 9.72% while VOO yields 1.04%, so QQQH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQQH?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.