QTR vs VYM
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QTR or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QTR led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 16.74% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 107 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.86%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +16.62%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.92%Best | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.67% | +12.05%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,365 | $17,663Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.2% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.1 years).
QTR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
QTR vs VYM Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTR returned +16.62% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, QTR is up 15.86% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Over three years, QTR compounded at +21.92% per year against +17.78% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.67% and +12.05% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for QTR and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTR charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTR currently yields 16.74% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
16.9% of QTR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.6% of VYM's money is in holdings QTR also owns.
VYM and QTR share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QTR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 107 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QTR (77.5% of the fund), and 67 for QTR that do not appear in VYM (80.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QTR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.79% | 7.35% | 4.56% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.91% | 1.86% | 0.05% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.04% | 1.02% | 0.02% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.01% | 0.90% | 0.11% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.03% | 0.78% | 0.25% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.08% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.77% | 0.73% | 0.04% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.80% | 0.66% | 0.14% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.17% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.87% | 0.34% | 0.53% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QTR and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTR or VYM?
QTR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QTR or VYM?
Over the past year QTR returned +16.62% vs +15.42% for VYM, so QTR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QTR or VYM?
QTR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QTR -31.7% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both QTR and VYM?
QTR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QTR and VYM?
19.6% of VYM's money is in holdings QTR also owns. 19.6% of VYM's is in holdings QTR also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QTR and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTR or VYM?
QTR yields 16.74% while VYM yields 2.22%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QTR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QTR led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.