QTR vs VYM
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $9M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 17.12% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +10.47% | +14.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.35% | +20.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.28% | +18.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.02% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QTR vs VYM Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTR returned +18.35% while VYM returned +20.67%. Year to date, QTR is up 10.47% versus a gain of 14.18% for VYM.
Over three years, QTR compounded at +18.28% per year against +18.47% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.02% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QTR has the edge at +10.25% annualized vs +6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for QTR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTR charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTR currently yields 17.12% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QTR and VYM share 28 holdings out of 677 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTR or VYM?
QTR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QTR or VYM?
Over the past year QTR returned +18.35% vs +20.67% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QTR annualized +10.25% vs +6.97% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QTR or VYM?
QTR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QTR -31.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QTR and VYM?
QTR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QTR and VYM?
QTR and VYM share 28 common holdings with a 15.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTR or VYM?
QTR yields 17.12% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.