QTR vs VTI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.06% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.20% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.21% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.99% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.91% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
QTR vs VTI Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTR returned +18.21% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, QTR is up 13.20% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, QTR compounded at +19.99% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.91% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QTR has the edge at +10.91% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for QTR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTR charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTR currently yields 16.06% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QTR and VTI share 90 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTR or VTI?
QTR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QTR or VTI?
Over the past year QTR returned +18.21% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QTR annualized +10.91% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QTR or VTI?
QTR has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QTR -31.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QTR and VTI?
QTR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QTR and VTI?
QTR and VTI share 90 common holdings with a 47.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTR or VTI?
QTR yields 16.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.