QTR vs VTI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QTR or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 16.74% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.86%Best | +14.05% |
| 1Y Return | +16.62% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.92% | +22.65%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.67% | +12.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,365 | $17,988Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Sep 22, 2026 (5.1 years).
QTR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
QTR vs VTI Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTR returned +16.62% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, QTR is up 15.86% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, QTR compounded at +21.92% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.67% and +12.46% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for QTR and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTR charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTR currently yields 16.74% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.0% of QTR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.5% of VTI's money is in holdings QTR also owns.
Most of QTR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
91 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QTR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 107 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,059 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QTR (49.9% of the fund), and 4 for QTR that do not appear in VTI (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QTR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.50% | 6.40% | 2.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 6.29% | 1.10% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.99% | 4.79% | 1.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.44% | 3.65% | 0.79% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.75% | 1.29% | 3.46% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.13% | 2.90% | 0.23% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.79% | 2.56% | 0.23% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.90% | 2.31% | 0.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.35% | 1.08% | 2.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.69% | 1.70% | 0.99% |
95.0% of QTR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTR or VTI?
QTR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QTR or VTI?
Over the past year QTR returned +16.62% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QTR or VTI?
QTR has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QTR -31.7% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both QTR and VTI?
QTR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QTR and VTI?
95.0% of QTR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.5% of VTI's is in holdings QTR also owns. They hold 91 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QTR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTR or VTI?
QTR yields 16.74% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QTR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.