QTR vs VOO
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 16.06% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.94% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.53% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.31% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.88% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | GLOBALXETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QTR vs VOO Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is a ETF from GLOBALXETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTR returned +19.53% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, QTR is up 12.94% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, QTR compounded at +20.31% per year against +21.78% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.88% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.7% for QTR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTR charges 0.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTR currently yields 16.06% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QTR and VOO share 88 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTR or VOO?
QTR has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QTR or VOO?
Over the past year QTR returned +19.53% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QTR annualized +10.88% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QTR or VOO?
QTR has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QTR -31.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QTR and VOO?
QTR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QTR and VOO?
QTR and VOO share 88 common holdings with a 53.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTR or VOO?
QTR yields 16.06% while VOO yields 1.09%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.