QTUM vs VOO

QTUM vs VOO

Which is better, QTUM or VOO?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. QTUM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QTUM is less concentrated, with 16.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: QTUMLess Concentrated: QTUM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQTUMVOO
Expense Ratio0.40%0.03%Best
AUM$5.4B$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.80%1.04%
Holdings179509
YTD Return+31.65%Best+12.50%
1Y Return+50.35%Best+17.58%
3Y Return (annualized)+45.00%Best+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+24.27%Best+12.95%
Volatility (annualized)26.1%16.9%Best
Max Drawdown-38.5%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$29,637Best$18,384
Top 10 Weight16.9%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyDefiance ETFs, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 4, 2018Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8 years).

QTUM vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.

QTUM vs VOO Performance

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTUM returned +50.35% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, QTUM is up 31.65% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Over three years, QTUM compounded at +45.00% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +24.27% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QTUM has the edge at +25.76% annualized vs +14.00%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QTUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 16.9% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for QTUM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QTUM charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTUM currently yields 0.80% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

QTUM already in VOO35.3%
VOO already in QTUM33.4%

35.3% of QTUM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.4% of VOO's money is in holdings QTUM also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, QTUM as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

32 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in QTUM and 505 in VOO, against full books of 179 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QTUM (66.0% of the fund), and 23 for QTUM that do not appear in VOO (27.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QTUMWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.1.30%7.51%6.21%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 371.51%4.30%2.79%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc1.29%3.62%2.33%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0011.13%3.25%2.12%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.18%2.77%1.59%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.27%2.02%0.75%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.1.23%1.47%0.24%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.69%0.42%1.27%
INTCIntel Corp.0.99%1.02%0.03%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.1.09%0.89%0.20%

35.3% of QTUM is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QTUMVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QTUM or VOO?

QTUM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QTUM or VOO?

Over the past year QTUM returned +50.35% vs +17.58% for VOO, so QTUM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QTUM annualized +25.76% vs +14.00% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QTUM or VOO?

QTUM has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 16.9% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QTUM -38.5% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both QTUM and VOO?

QTUM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between QTUM and VOO?

35.3% of QTUM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 33.4% of VOO's is in holdings QTUM also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 86 positions we hold weights for in QTUM and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, QTUM or VOO?

QTUM yields 0.80% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than QTUM?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. QTUM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QTUM is less concentrated, with 16.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.