QTUM vs VOO
Defiance Quantum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QTUM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QTUM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.83% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 87 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +34.39% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +65.91% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +47.00% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 4, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QTUM vs VOO Performance
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QTUM returned +65.91% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, QTUM is up 34.39% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, QTUM compounded at +47.00% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +25.96% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QTUM has the edge at +26.29% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for QTUM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QTUM charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QTUM currently yields 0.83% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QTUM and VOO share 32 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QTUM or VOO?
QTUM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QTUM or VOO?
Over the past year QTUM returned +65.91% vs +21.87% for VOO, so QTUM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QTUM annualized +26.29% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QTUM or VOO?
QTUM has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QTUM -38.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QTUM and VOO?
QTUM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QTUM and VOO?
QTUM and VOO share 32 common holdings with a 17.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QTUM or VOO?
QTUM yields 0.83% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.