QUS vs VTI
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QUS or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. QUS is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QUS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 516 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +10.53% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.15% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.92% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.70% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8%Best | 15.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.8%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,389 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.3%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 15, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 16, 2015 to Oct 2, 2026 (11.5 years).
QUS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.5 years both funds cover.
QUS vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QUS returned +13.15% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, QUS is up 10.53% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, QUS compounded at +18.92% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.70% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.20% annualized vs +11.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.8% for QUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.8% for QUS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QUS charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QUS currently yields 1.25% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of QUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 89.3% of VTI's money is in holdings QUS also owns.
Most of QUS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
496 positions in common, counted across the 513 positions we hold weights for in QUS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 516 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 663 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for QUS (8.6% of the fund), and 8 for QUS that do not appear in VTI (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QUS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.20% | 6.29% | 3.09% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.74% | 6.40% | 3.66% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.59% | 4.79% | 1.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.00% | 3.65% | 2.65% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.29% | 2.90% | 1.61% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.37% | 1.70% | 0.67% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.12% | 1.35% | 0.77% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.15% | 2.31% | 1.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.49% | 2.56% | 2.07% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 1.97% | 0.83% | 1.14% |
98.3% of QUS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QUS or VTI?
QUS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QUS or VTI?
Over the past year QUS returned +13.15% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), QUS annualized +11.45% vs +12.20% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QUS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.8% for QUS. Worst drawdown: QUS -33.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both QUS and VTI?
QUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QUS and VTI?
98.3% of QUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 89.3% of VTI's is in holdings QUS also owns. They hold 496 positions in common, counted across the 513 positions we hold weights for in QUS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QUS or VTI?
QUS yields 1.25% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QUS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. QUS is less concentrated, with 22.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.