QYLD vs VTI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QYLD or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QYLD led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QYLD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $8.3B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.62% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 105 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.59%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +22.25%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.84% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.16% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.7%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,802 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2013 to Sep 11, 2026 (12.7 years).
QYLD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.7 years both funds cover.
QYLD vs VTI Performance
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QYLD returned +22.25% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, QYLD is up 12.59% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, QYLD compounded at +14.84% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.16% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.32% annualized vs +2.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 11.0% for QYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.7% for QYLD and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QYLD charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QYLD currently yields 11.62% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.9% of QYLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of QYLD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, QYLD as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
89 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QYLD and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 105 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QYLD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 8.61% | 6.32% | 2.29% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.82% | 5.84% | 1.98% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 6.09% | 3.81% | 2.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.49% | 3.17% | 1.32% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.76% | 1.79% | 2.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 2.88% | 0.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.87% | 2.46% | 0.41% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.97% | 2.27% | 0.70% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.39% | 1.30% | 2.09% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.91% | 1.63% | 1.28% |
95.9% of QYLD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QYLD or VTI?
QYLD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QYLD or VTI?
Over the past year QYLD returned +22.25% vs +17.22% for VTI, so QYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), QYLD annualized +2.98% vs +12.32% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QYLD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 11.0% for QYLD. Worst drawdown: QYLD -30.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both QYLD and VTI?
QYLD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QYLD and VTI?
At least 95.9% of QYLD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 89 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QYLD and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QYLD or VTI?
QYLD yields 11.62% while VTI yields 1.03%, so QYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QYLD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QYLD led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.