RGEF vs VTI
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RGEF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGEF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $838M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.30% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.03% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
RGEF vs VTI Performance
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGEF returned +25.03% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RGEF is up 14.30% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.8% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for RGEF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGEF charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGEF currently yields 0.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RGEF and VTI share 30 holdings out of 2826 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGEF or VTI?
RGEF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGEF or VTI?
Over the past year RGEF returned +25.03% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RGEF annualized +21.42% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGEF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.8% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: RGEF -16.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RGEF and VTI?
RGEF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RGEF and VTI?
RGEF and VTI share 30 common holdings with a 27.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2826 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGEF or VTI?
RGEF yields 0.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.