RGEF vs VOO
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RGEF or VOO?
RGEF has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RGEF is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGEF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $817M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 71 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.87%Best | +11.55% |
| 1Y Return | +20.75%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $14,122Best | $13,399 |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.1%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2024 to Sep 10, 2026 (1.9 years).
RGEF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
RGEF vs VOO Performance
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGEF returned +20.75% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, RGEF is up 12.87% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.7% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for RGEF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGEF charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGEF currently yields 0.95% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
54.0% of RGEF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.5% of VOO's money is in holdings RGEF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, RGEF as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
29 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in RGEF and 505 in VOO, against full books of 71 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RGEF (60.0% of the fund), and 5 for RGEF that do not appear in VOO (8.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGEF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.92% | 7.51% | 3.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.53% | 4.30% | 0.23% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.14% | 6.59% | 4.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 5.46% | 3.25% | 2.21% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.47% | 3.62% | 0.15% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 3.84% | 1.47% | 2.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 2.62% | 1.92% | 0.70% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.36% | 2.77% | 1.41% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.49% | 0.89% | 1.60% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.87% | 1.26% | 0.61% |
54.0% of RGEF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGEF or VOO?
RGEF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGEF or VOO?
Over the past year RGEF returned +20.75% vs +17.54% for VOO, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RGEF annualized +19.92% vs +16.65% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGEF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.7% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: RGEF -16.0% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both RGEF and VOO?
RGEF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RGEF and VOO?
54.0% of RGEF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 39.5% of VOO's is in holdings RGEF also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 66 positions we hold weights for in RGEF and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGEF or VOO?
RGEF yields 0.95% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RGEF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGEF led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. RGEF is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.