RGEF vs VOO
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGEF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGEF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $838M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.92% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.99% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 25, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RGEF vs VOO Performance
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF) is a ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGEF returned +23.99% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, RGEF is up 13.92% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.8% for RGEF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for RGEF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGEF charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGEF currently yields 0.96% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RGEF and VOO share 29 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGEF or VOO?
RGEF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGEF or VOO?
Over the past year RGEF returned +23.99% vs +20.92% for VOO, so RGEF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RGEF annualized +21.23% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGEF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.8% for RGEF. Worst drawdown: RGEF -16.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RGEF and VOO?
RGEF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RGEF and VOO?
RGEF and VOO share 29 common holdings with a 29.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGEF or VOO?
RGEF yields 0.96% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.