RSPG vs SPY
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. RSPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPG | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $597M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +41.59% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +55.49% | +21.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.06% | +21.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.42% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | Jan 22, 1993 |
RSPG vs SPY Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year RSPG returned +55.49% while SPY returned +21.82%. Year to date, RSPG is up 41.59% versus a gain of 12.68% for SPY.
Over three years, RSPG compounded at +17.06% per year against +21.98% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +27.42% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.81% annualized vs +5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.1% for RSPG and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPG charges 0.40% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $9 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPG currently yields 1.99% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
RSPG and SPY share 21 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPG or SPY?
RSPG has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPG or SPY?
Over the past year RSPG returned +55.49% vs +21.82% for SPY, so RSPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPG annualized +5.13% vs +8.81% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPG or SPY?
RSPG has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: RSPG -82.1% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both RSPG and SPY?
RSPG and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPG and SPY?
RSPG and SPY share 21 common holdings with a 3.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPG or SPY?
RSPG yields 1.99% while SPY yields 1.01%, so RSPG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.