RSPG vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSPG or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPG led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $642M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 24 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +44.28%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +51.78%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.90% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.26%Best | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.1% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.1% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $32,087Best | $17,514 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.8 years).
RSPG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
RSPG vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPG returned +51.78% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, RSPG is up 44.28% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPG compounded at +15.90% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +26.26% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.39% annualized vs +5.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.1% for RSPG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPG charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPG currently yields 1.82% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 100.0% of RSPG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of RSPG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
22 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in RSPG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 24 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VLOValero Energy Corp. | 5.43% | 0.11% | 5.32% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 5.36% | 0.10% | 5.26% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.62% | 0.78% | 3.84% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 5.12% | 0.09% | 5.03% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 4.53% | 0.43% | 4.10% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Trust | 4.76% | 0.04% | 4.72% |
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 4.75% | 0.03% | 4.72% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 4.62% | 0.09% | 4.53% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 4.44% | 0.17% | 4.27% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 4.47% | 0.12% | 4.35% |
100.0% of RSPG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPG or VTI?
RSPG has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPG or VTI?
Over the past year RSPG returned +51.78% vs +17.22% for VTI, so RSPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPG annualized +5.21% vs +9.39% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPG or VTI?
RSPG has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPG -82.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPG and VTI?
RSPG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPG and VTI?
At least 100.0% of RSPG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 23 positions we hold weights for in RSPG and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPG or VTI?
RSPG yields 1.82% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RSPG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSPG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPG led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.