RSPG vs VOO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RSPG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $597M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +41.59% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +55.49% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.06% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.42% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -82.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RSPG vs VOO Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPG returned +55.49% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, RSPG is up 41.59% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, RSPG compounded at +17.06% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +27.42% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.1% for RSPG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPG charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPG currently yields 1.99% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RSPG and VOO share 21 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPG or VOO?
RSPG has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPG or VOO?
Over the past year RSPG returned +55.49% vs +21.87% for VOO, so RSPG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RSPG annualized +5.13% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPG or VOO?
RSPG has been the more volatile fund at 31.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RSPG -82.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RSPG and VOO?
RSPG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPG and VOO?
RSPG and VOO share 21 common holdings with a 3.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPG or VOO?
RSPG yields 1.99% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RSPG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.