SCHD vs USNZ
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF
Which is better, SCHD or USNZ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, USNZ over 3Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | USNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.10% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $297M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.93% |
| Holdings | 103 | 310 |
| YTD Return | +24.59%Best | +11.69% |
| 1Y Return | +28.14%Best | +17.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.58% | +20.07%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.90% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1%Best | -19.2% |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $16,327 | $20,610Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 44.1% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jun 27, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 28, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.2 years).
SCHD vs USNZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs USNZ Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +28.14% while USNZ returned +17.47%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.59% versus a gain of 11.69% for USNZ.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.58% per year against +20.07% for USNZ. Across the full 4-year window we track, USNZ has the edge at +18.79% annualized vs +12.38%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USNZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for SCHD and -19.2% for USNZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while USNZ charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $10 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.93% for USNZ.
Holdings Overlap
64.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings USNZ also owns. 6.6% of USNZ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
29 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 298 in USNZ, against full books of 103 and 310.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 259 positions for USNZ that do not appear in our book for SCHD (92.6% of the fund), and 70 for SCHD that do not appear in USNZ (35.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in USNZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 4.77% | 0.61% | 4.16% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.70% | 0.44% | 4.26% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 4.69% | 0.40% | 4.29% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 3.88% | 0.56% | 3.32% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 3.83% | 0.56% | 3.27% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 3.82% | 0.57% | 3.25% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 3.97% | 0.33% | 3.64% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.64% | 0.37% | 3.27% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 3.33% | 0.30% | 3.03% |
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc | 3.13% | 0.47% | 2.66% |
64.8% of SCHD is already inside USNZ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or USNZ?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while USNZ charges 0.10%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or USNZ?
Over the past year SCHD returned +28.14% vs +17.47% for USNZ, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SCHD annualized +12.38% vs +18.79% for USNZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or USNZ?
USNZ has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -16.1% vs USNZ -19.2%.
Should I hold both SCHD and USNZ?
SCHD and USNZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and USNZ?
64.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings USNZ also owns. 6.6% of USNZ's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 298 in USNZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or USNZ?
SCHD yields 3.00% while USNZ yields 0.93%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USNZ better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, USNZ over 3Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.