SFLR vs VYM
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SFLR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 197 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +4.99% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.71% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.79% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SFLR vs VYM Performance
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SFLR returned +11.71% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, SFLR is up 4.99% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, SFLR compounded at +14.79% per year against +18.72% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SFLR has the edge at +16.08% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 9.4% for SFLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for SFLR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SFLR charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SFLR currently yields 0.28% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SFLR and VYM share 71 holdings out of 718 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SFLR or VYM?
SFLR has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $85 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SFLR or VYM?
Over the past year SFLR returned +11.71% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SFLR annualized +16.08% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SFLR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 9.4% for SFLR. Worst drawdown: SFLR -12.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SFLR and VYM?
SFLR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SFLR and VYM?
SFLR and VYM share 71 common holdings with a 27.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 718 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SFLR or VYM?
SFLR yields 0.28% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.