SGLC vs VTI
SGI US Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SGLC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SGLC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $200M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.20% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 123 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.73% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.24% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.15% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
SGLC vs VTI Performance
SGI US Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SGLC returned +29.24% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, SGLC is up 19.73% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, SGLC compounded at +22.15% per year against +21.51% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, SGLC has the edge at +23.11% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.2% for SGLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for SGLC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SGLC charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SGLC currently yields 0.20% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SGLC and VTI share 116 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 41.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SGLC or VTI?
SGLC has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SGLC or VTI?
Over the past year SGLC returned +29.24% vs +22.39% for VTI, so SGLC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), SGLC annualized +23.11% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SGLC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.2% for SGLC. Worst drawdown: SGLC -20.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SGLC and VTI?
SGLC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SGLC and VTI?
SGLC and VTI share 116 common holdings with a 41.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SGLC or VTI?
SGLC yields 0.20% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.