SNPG vs VTI
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SNPG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SNPG led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNPG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 87 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +10.00% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.56% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.34%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $24,690Best | $21,263 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 9, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.9 years).
SNPG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
SNPG vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers S&P 500 Growth Scored & Screened ETF (SNPG) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNPG returned +13.56% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, SNPG is up 10.00% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, SNPG compounded at +22.34% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNPG has the edge at +26.08% annualized vs +21.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNPG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.7% for SNPG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNPG charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNPG currently yields 0.47% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.5% of SNPG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 32.8% of VTI's money is in holdings SNPG also owns.
Most of SNPG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
83 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SNPG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 87 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,068 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SNPG (64.7% of the fund), and 1 for SNPG that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SNPG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 11.19% | 4.79% | 6.40% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.31% | 6.40% | 2.91% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 8.27% | 1.29% | 6.98% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 7.05% | 1.35% | 5.70% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.78% | 2.90% | 1.88% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.83% | 2.31% | 1.52% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.65% | 0.83% | 1.82% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.79% | 0.52% | 2.27% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.76% | 0.51% | 2.25% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.67% | 0.56% | 2.11% |
99.5% of SNPG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNPG or VTI?
SNPG has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SNPG or VTI?
Over the past year SNPG returned +13.56% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNPG annualized +26.08% vs +21.34% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SNPG or VTI?
SNPG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SNPG -21.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SNPG and VTI?
SNPG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SNPG and VTI?
99.5% of SNPG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 32.8% of VTI's is in holdings SNPG also owns. They hold 83 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SNPG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNPG or VTI?
SNPG yields 0.47% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SNPG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SNPG led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.