SPUS vs VTI
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SPUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPUS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 216 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.80% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.19% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.47% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.31% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SP Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
SPUS vs VTI Performance
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) is a ETF from SP Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPUS returned +26.19% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, SPUS is up 15.80% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, SPUS compounded at +23.47% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.31% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SPUS has the edge at +18.53% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.8% for SPUS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPUS charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPUS currently yields 0.72% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SPUS and VTI share 200 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPUS or VTI?
SPUS has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPUS or VTI?
Over the past year SPUS returned +26.19% vs +22.19% for VTI, so SPUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SPUS annualized +18.53% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPUS or VTI?
SPUS has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SPUS -30.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SPUS and VTI?
SPUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SPUS and VTI?
SPUS and VTI share 200 common holdings with a 50.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPUS or VTI?
SPUS yields 0.72% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.