SPY vs XLV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, SPY or XLV?
Each has led over a different period.
XLV has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y and 5Y, XLV over 1Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | XLV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.08%Best |
| AUM | $804.7B | $44.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 505 | 63 |
| YTD Return | +11.52%Best | +7.44% |
| 1Y Return | +17.48% | +22.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.62%Best | +9.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.73%Best | +6.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -40.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,205Best | $13,490 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.0%Best | 60.7% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 22, 1998 to Sep 10, 2026 (27.7 years).
SPY vs XLV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 27.7 years both funds cover.
SPY vs XLV Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year SPY returned +17.48% while XLV returned +22.74%. Year to date, SPY is up 11.52% versus a gain of 7.44% for XLV.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +20.62% per year against +9.43% for XLV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.73% and +6.17% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, XLV has the edge at +7.40% annualized vs +7.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.2% for XLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -40.6% for XLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while XLV charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 1.49% for XLV.
Holdings Overlap
8.8% of SPY's money is in holdings XLV also owns. 99.8% of XLV's money is in holdings SPY also owns.
Most of XLV is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
60 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 61 in XLV, against full books of 505 and 63.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 504 and 61 positions we hold weights for.
SPY holds 435 positions XLV does not, 90.7% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.71%, AAPL 6.83%, MSFT 5.50%, AMZN 4.08%, GOOGL 3.33%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPY | Weight in XLV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.33% | 15.68% | 14.35% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.92% | 10.43% | 9.51% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.65% | 7.26% | 6.61% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 0.56% | 6.18% | 5.62% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.47% | 5.31% | 4.84% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.32% | 3.71% | 3.39% |
| TMOThermo Fisher Scientific Inc | 0.32% | 3.69% | 3.37% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.28% | 3.14% | 2.86% |
| GILDGilead Sciences Inc | 0.25% | 2.76% | 2.51% |
| PFEPfizer, Inc. | 0.22% | 2.55% | 2.33% |
99.8% of XLV is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or XLV?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XLV charges 0.08%. XLV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPY or XLV?
Over the past year SPY returned +17.48% vs +22.74% for XLV, so XLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), SPY annualized +7.14% vs +7.40% for XLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPY or XLV?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.2% for XLV. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs XLV -40.6%.
Should I hold both SPY and XLV?
SPY and XLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and XLV?
99.8% of XLV's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 99.8% of XLV's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 61 in XLV.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XLV?
SPY yields 0.98% while XLV yields 1.49%, so XLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLV better than SPY?
XLV has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y and 5Y, XLV over 1Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.