STXG vs VTI
Strive 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, STXG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. STXG led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STXG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $149M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 709 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.88% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.19% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.05%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -21.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $22,756Best | $20,428 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2022 to Sep 25, 2026 (3.9 years).
STXG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
STXG vs VTI Performance
Strive 1000 Growth ETF (STXG) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STXG returned +16.19% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, STXG is up 12.88% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, STXG compounded at +25.05% per year against +23.04% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, STXG has the edge at +23.47% annualized vs +20.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 13.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.2% for STXG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STXG charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STXG currently yields 0.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of STXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 83.8% of VTI's money is in holdings STXG also owns.
Most of STXG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
676 positions in common, counted across the 702 positions we hold weights for in STXG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 709 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 519 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for STXG (13.9% of the fund), and 13 for STXG that do not appear in VTI (0.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in STXG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.86% | 6.40% | 3.46% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.74% | 6.29% | 2.45% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.20% | 4.79% | 2.41% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.83% | 3.65% | 1.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.75% | 2.90% | 0.85% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.29% | 2.56% | 0.73% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.99% | 2.31% | 0.68% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.40% | 1.70% | 0.70% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.36% | 1.22% | 1.14% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.88% | 1.35% | 0.53% |
99.1% of STXG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STXG or VTI?
STXG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, STXG or VTI?
Over the past year STXG returned +16.19% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), STXG annualized +23.47% vs +20.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, STXG or VTI?
STXG has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 13.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: STXG -21.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both STXG and VTI?
STXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between STXG and VTI?
99.1% of STXG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 83.8% of VTI's is in holdings STXG also owns. They hold 676 positions in common, counted across the 702 positions we hold weights for in STXG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, STXG or VTI?
STXG yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than STXG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. STXG led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.