SXQG vs VOO
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SXQG or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SXQG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| Holdings | 170 | 519 |
| YTD Return | +1.88% | +12.11%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.00% | +12.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.98% | +21.54%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.98% | +11.93%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,155 | $17,568Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.7% | 39.1%Best |
| Fund Family | 6 Meridian ETF | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 10, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2021 to Nov 11, 2026 (5.5 years).
SXQG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.5 years both funds cover.
SXQG vs VOO Performance
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is an ETF from 6 Meridian ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SXQG returned +0.00% while VOO returned +12.50%. Year to date, SXQG is up 1.88% versus a gain of 12.11% for VOO.
Over three years, SXQG compounded at +10.98% per year against +21.54% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.98% and +11.93% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.22% annualized vs +6.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SXQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for SXQG and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SXQG charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SXQG currently yields 0.00% against 1.05% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
89.7% of SXQG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.2% of VOO's money is in holdings SXQG also owns.
Most of SXQG is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
52 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SXQG and 506 in VOO, against full books of 170 and 519.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 449 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SXQG (63.8% of the fund), and 28 for SXQG that do not appear in VOO (8.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SXQG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.62% | 8.39% | 3.77% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 5.05% | 7.38% | 2.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.16% | 5.78% | 0.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.94% | 3.07% | 1.87% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.67% | 1.83% | 1.84% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.93% | 1.41% | 2.52% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 4.51% | 0.65% | 3.86% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.02% | 0.91% | 3.11% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.98% | 0.68% | 3.30% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 3.85% | 0.61% | 3.24% |
89.7% of SXQG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SXQG or VOO?
Over the past year SXQG returned +0.00% vs +12.50% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), SXQG annualized +6.01% vs +13.22% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SXQG -34.0% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both SXQG and VOO?
SXQG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SXQG and VOO?
89.7% of SXQG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.2% of VOO's is in holdings SXQG also owns. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 84 positions we hold weights for in SXQG and 506 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.05%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SXQG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.