SXQG vs VOO
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SXQG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $65M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 94 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.01% | +12.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.38% | +20.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.03% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.92% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | 6 Meridian ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 10, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SXQG vs VOO Performance
ETC 6 Meridian Quality Growth ETF (SXQG) is a ETF from 6 Meridian ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SXQG returned +1.38% while VOO returned +20.22%. Year to date, SXQG is up 3.01% versus a gain of 12.38% for VOO.
Over three years, SXQG compounded at +12.03% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.92% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SXQG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for SXQG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SXQG charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SXQG currently yields 0.01% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SXQG and VOO share 37 holdings out of 561 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SXQG or VOO?
Over the past year SXQG returned +1.38% vs +20.22% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SXQG annualized +6.49% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SXQG -34.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SXQG and VOO?
SXQG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SXQG and VOO?
SXQG and VOO share 37 common holdings with a 26.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 561 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SXQG or VOO?
SXQG yields 0.01% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.