TCHP vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTCHPVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.57%0.04%
AUM$2.1B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.86%
Holdings57568
YTD Return+3.95%+15.80%
1Y Return+10.18%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+22.37%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.38%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)20.0%14.6%
Max Drawdown-42.3%-58.8%
Fund FamilyT.Rowe PriceVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 4, 2020Nov 10, 2006

TCHP vs VYM Performance

T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TCHP returned +10.18% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, TCHP is up 3.95% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, TCHP compounded at +22.37% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.38% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, TCHP has the edge at +12.65% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.3% for TCHP and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TCHP charges 0.57% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $4 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TCHP currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

8.4%overlap

TCHP and VYM share 10 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TCHPWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO4.91%6.47%1.56%
PG0.26%1.72%1.46%
UNH0.62%1.17%0.55%
CBProProPro
GSProProPro
MSProProPro
TXNProProPro
TELProProPro
CLProProPro
MDLZProProPro
See all 10 holdings TCHP shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TCHP or VYM?

TCHP has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TCHP or VYM?

Over the past year TCHP returned +10.18% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), TCHP annualized +12.65% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TCHP or VYM?

TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TCHP -42.3% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both TCHP and VYM?

TCHP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between TCHP and VYM?

TCHP and VYM share 10 common holdings with a 8.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, TCHP or VYM?

TCHP yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →