TCHP vs VOO
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TCHP or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TCHP led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TCHP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 65 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +1.33% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.93% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.48% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.3% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,023 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 56.7% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 5, 2020 to Sep 17, 2026 (6.1 years).
TCHP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
TCHP vs VOO Performance
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TCHP returned +3.93% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, TCHP is up 1.33% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, TCHP compounded at +21.27% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.48% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +16.03% annualized vs +11.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 15.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.3% for TCHP and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TCHP charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TCHP currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.8% of TCHP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.0% of VOO's money is in holdings TCHP also owns.
Most of TCHP is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
57 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in TCHP and 494 in VOO, against full books of 65 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 430 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TCHP (46.1% of the fund), and 4 for TCHP that do not appear in VOO (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TCHP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.94% | 7.55% | 8.39% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.54% | 7.05% | 2.51% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.38% | 5.36% | 0.98% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.85% | 3.24% | 2.61% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 6.31% | 2.62% | 3.69% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.96% | 2.86% | 3.10% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.32% | 4.13% | 0.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.51% | 1.90% | 1.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.64% | 1.21% | 2.43% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.19% | 1.41% | 1.78% |
94.8% of TCHP is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TCHP or VOO?
TCHP has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TCHP or VOO?
Over the past year TCHP returned +3.93% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), TCHP annualized +11.93% vs +16.03% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TCHP or VOO?
TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TCHP -42.3% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both TCHP and VOO?
TCHP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TCHP and VOO?
94.8% of TCHP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.0% of VOO's is in holdings TCHP also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in TCHP and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TCHP or VOO?
TCHP yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TCHP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TCHP led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 56.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.