TDIV vs VOO
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TDIV or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TDIV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TDIV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.4B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.37% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 192 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +19.79%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | +16.96% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.72%Best | +23.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.30%Best | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.0%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,207Best | $19,128 |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.3% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 13, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 14, 2012 to Sep 21, 2026 (14.1 years).
TDIV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.1 years both funds cover.
TDIV vs VOO Performance
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TDIV returned +16.96% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, TDIV is up 19.79% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, TDIV compounded at +28.72% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +17.30% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, TDIV has the edge at +14.09% annualized vs +13.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TDIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.0% for TDIV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TDIV charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TDIV currently yields 1.37% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
76.7% of TDIV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 14.1% of VOO's money is in holdings TDIV also owns.
Most of TDIV is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
32 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in TDIV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 192 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 455 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TDIV (85.0% of the fund), and 37 for TDIV that do not appear in VOO (6.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TDIV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.66% | 5.36% | 4.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 7.11% | 2.86% | 4.25% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 6.74% | 0.33% | 6.41% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 6.19% | 0.39% | 5.80% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 5.44% | 0.34% | 5.10% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.91% | 0.24% | 2.67% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 2.82% | 0.23% | 2.59% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 2.62% | 0.28% | 2.34% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.25% | 0.63% | 1.62% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 2.58% | 0.11% | 2.47% |
76.7% of TDIV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TDIV or VOO?
TDIV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TDIV or VOO?
Over the past year TDIV returned +16.96% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), TDIV annualized +14.09% vs +13.52% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TDIV or VOO?
TDIV has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TDIV -32.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TDIV and VOO?
TDIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TDIV and VOO?
76.7% of TDIV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 14.1% of VOO's is in holdings TDIV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 93 positions we hold weights for in TDIV and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TDIV or VOO?
TDIV yields 1.37% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TDIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TDIV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TDIV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.