TDV vs VTI
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TDV or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TDV led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. TDV is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TDV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $267M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +16.52%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +16.69%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.59% | +22.50%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.03% | +12.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.8%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,647 | $17,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.5%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Oct 1, 2026 (6.9 years).
TDV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
TDV vs VTI Performance
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TDV returned +16.69% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, TDV is up 16.52% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Over three years, TDV compounded at +18.59% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.03% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, TDV has the edge at +15.67% annualized vs +14.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.8% for TDV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TDV charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TDV currently yields 1.03% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
91.6% of TDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 19.4% of VTI's money is in holdings TDV also owns.
Most of TDV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in TDV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 37 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,120 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TDV (78.1% of the fund), and 2 for TDV that do not appear in VTI (4.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.65% | 6.29% | 3.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.36% | 4.79% | 1.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.26% | 2.56% | 0.30% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.76% | 0.83% | 1.93% |
| HPQHP Inc | 3.52% | 0.03% | 3.49% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 3.14% | 0.29% | 2.85% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.80% | 0.63% | 2.17% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 2.99% | 0.31% | 2.68% |
| DLBDOLBY LABORATORIES INC-CL A | 3.27% | 0.00% | 3.27% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 3.10% | 0.12% | 2.98% |
91.6% of TDV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TDV or VTI?
TDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TDV or VTI?
Over the past year TDV returned +16.69% vs +15.23% for VTI, so TDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), TDV annualized +15.67% vs +14.80% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TDV or VTI?
TDV has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TDV -32.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both TDV and VTI?
TDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TDV and VTI?
91.6% of TDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 19.4% of VTI's is in holdings TDV also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in TDV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TDV or VTI?
TDV yields 1.03% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TDV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TDV led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. TDV is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.