TDV vs VOO
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TDV or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. TDV is less concentrated, with 32.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TDV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $274M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 38 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +13.78%Best | +13.21% |
| 1Y Return | +14.11% | +17.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.40% | +22.66%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.05% | +13.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.1% | 16.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -32.8%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,889 | $18,539Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.2%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Sep 24, 2026 (6.9 years).
TDV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
TDV vs VOO Performance
ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TDV returned +14.11% while VOO returned +17.37%. Year to date, TDV is up 13.78% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.
Over three years, TDV compounded at +17.40% per year against +22.66% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.05% and +13.14% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.53% annualized vs +15.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 16.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.8% for TDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TDV charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TDV currently yields 1.03% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
64.8% of TDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 21.7% of VOO's money is in holdings TDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in TDV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 38 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 463 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TDV (77.5% of the fund), and 12 for TDV that do not appear in VOO (31.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TDV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.49% | 7.05% | 4.56% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.32% | 5.36% | 2.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.39% | 2.86% | 0.47% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.74% | 0.93% | 1.81% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.83% | 0.72% | 2.11% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 3.23% | 0.14% | 3.09% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 3.03% | 0.34% | 2.69% |
| ROPRoper Technologies Inc. | 3.22% | 0.06% | 3.16% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 3.23% | 0.03% | 3.20% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 2.91% | 0.33% | 2.58% |
64.8% of TDV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TDV or VOO?
TDV has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TDV or VOO?
Over the past year TDV returned +14.11% vs +17.37% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), TDV annualized +15.31% vs +15.53% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TDV or VOO?
TDV has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 16.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TDV -32.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TDV and VOO?
TDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TDV and VOO?
64.8% of TDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 21.7% of VOO's is in holdings TDV also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in TDV and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TDV or VOO?
TDV yields 1.03% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TDV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. TDV is less concentrated, with 32.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.