TGLB vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TGLB or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGLB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $27M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 124 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.74%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +16.54% | +16.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,947 | $12,550Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.2 years).
TGLB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
TGLB vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGLB returned +16.54% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, TGLB is up 15.74% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TGLB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.1% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for TGLB and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGLB charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TGLB currently yields 0.17% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
68.5% of TGLB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.6% of VTI's money is in holdings TGLB also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
36 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in TGLB and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 124 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,115 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TGLB (62.9% of the fund), and 1 for TGLB that do not appear in VTI (1.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TGLB | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.40% | 6.40% | 1.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.44% | 6.29% | 2.85% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 5.83% | 2.31% | 3.52% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.92% | 4.79% | 2.87% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.43% | 2.56% | 0.87% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.21% | 3.65% | 1.44% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.19% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 2.87% | 0.18% | 2.69% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.64% | 1.31% | 0.33% |
| HUMHumana Inc. | 2.61% | 0.06% | 2.55% |
68.5% of TGLB is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGLB or VTI?
TGLB has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TGLB or VTI?
Over the past year TGLB returned +16.54% vs +16.78% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TGLB annualized +15.98% vs +20.84% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TGLB or VTI?
TGLB has been the more volatile fund at 12.1% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TGLB -9.8% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both TGLB and VTI?
TGLB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TGLB and VTI?
68.5% of TGLB's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 34.6% of VTI's is in holdings TGLB also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in TGLB and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TGLB or VTI?
TGLB yields 0.17% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TGLB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.