THRV vs VTI

THRV vs VTI

Which is better, THRV or VTI?

Long Term Low Quality against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTHRVVTI
Expense Ratio1.80%0.03%Best
AUM$10M$666.9B
Dividend Yield6.11%1.03%
Holdings453,543
YTD Return+1.58%+11.65%Best
1Y Return+1.77%+17.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.35%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.72%
Volatility (annualized)2.2%Best13.2%
Fund FamilyProspera Funds Inc.Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term Low QualityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 30, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

THRV vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

THRV vs VTI Performance

Prospera Income ETF (THRV) is an ETF from Prospera Funds Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year THRV returned +1.77% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, THRV is up 1.58% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 2.2% for THRV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

THRV charges 1.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $180 vs $3 annually, a gap of $177 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THRV currently yields 6.11% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 38 holdings in THRV and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 88.0% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.

2 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in THRV and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 45 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in THRVWeight in VTIDifference
SEVNSeven Hills Realty Trust1.17%0.00%1.17%
XNXDTXNexpoint Strategic Opportunities Fund0.78%0.00%0.78%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of THRV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

THRVVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, THRV or VTI?

THRV has an expense ratio of 1.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $177 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, THRV or VTI?

Over the past year THRV returned +1.77% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, THRV or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 2.2% for THRV.

Should I hold both THRV and VTI?

THRV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, THRV or VTI?

THRV yields 6.11% while VTI yields 1.03%, so THRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than THRV?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.