TMFM vs VTI
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMFM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $113M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.32% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.41% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.07% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 17, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
TMFM vs VTI Performance
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMFM returned -9.41% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, TMFM is down 0.32% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, TMFM compounded at +4.07% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -0.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.8% for TMFM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMFM charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMFM currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TMFM and VTI share 21 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMFM or VTI?
TMFM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMFM or VTI?
Over the past year TMFM returned -9.41% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), TMFM annualized -0.94% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMFM or VTI?
TMFM has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TMFM -31.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TMFM and VTI?
TMFM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMFM and VTI?
TMFM and VTI share 21 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMFM or VTI?
TMFM yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.