TMFM vs VOO
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMFM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $113M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.32% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -9.41% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.07% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 17, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TMFM vs VOO Performance
Motley Fool Mid Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMFM returned -9.41% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, TMFM is down 0.32% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, TMFM compounded at +4.07% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -0.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.8% for TMFM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMFM charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMFM currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TMFM and VOO share 13 holdings out of 525 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMFM or VOO?
TMFM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMFM or VOO?
Over the past year TMFM returned -9.41% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), TMFM annualized -0.94% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMFM or VOO?
TMFM has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TMFM -31.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TMFM and VOO?
TMFM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMFM and VOO?
TMFM and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 525 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMFM or VOO?
TMFM yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.