USMC vs VTI
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, USMC or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USMC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.32%Best | +14.05% |
| 1Y Return | +13.75% | +16.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.69%Best | +22.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.04%Best | +12.46% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 16.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -30.0%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,149Best | $17,988 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.4% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Principal Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2017 to Sep 22, 2026 (8.9 years).
USMC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
USMC vs VTI Performance
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USMC returned +13.75% while VTI returned +16.93%. Year to date, USMC is up 14.32% versus a gain of 14.05% for VTI.
Over three years, USMC compounded at +22.69% per year against +22.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.04% and +12.46% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, USMC has the edge at +14.43% annualized vs +13.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.4% for USMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.0% for USMC and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USMC charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USMC currently yields 0.74% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.8% of USMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 43.3% of VTI's money is in holdings USMC also owns.
Most of USMC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in USMC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 29 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,124 positions USMC does not, 54.2% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.31%, AMD 1.08%, CSCO 0.57%, AMAT 0.56%, UNH 0.52%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in USMC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.09% | 6.40% | 1.69% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.06% | 6.29% | 0.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 4.79% | 0.90% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 7.06% | 1.29% | 5.77% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.35% | 2.90% | 2.45% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.81% | 3.65% | 0.16% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.55% | 2.56% | 1.99% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.65% | 1.31% | 3.34% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.65% | 0.83% | 3.82% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.46% | 1.70% | 1.76% |
99.8% of USMC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USMC or VTI?
USMC has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, USMC or VTI?
Over the past year USMC returned +13.75% vs +16.93% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), USMC annualized +14.43% vs +13.63% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, USMC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.4% for USMC. Worst drawdown: USMC -30.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both USMC and VTI?
USMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between USMC and VTI?
99.8% of USMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 43.3% of VTI's is in holdings USMC also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in USMC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, USMC or VTI?
USMC yields 0.74% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than USMC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. USMC led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.