VOO vs VTHR
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VTHR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTHR offers more diversification with 2392 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | VTHR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $4.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.23% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 2,929 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +14.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.63% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +21.13% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +12.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -34.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 20, 2010 |
VOO vs VTHR Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOO returned +21.63% while VTHR returned +21.89%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.72% versus a gain of 14.12% for VTHR.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.55% per year against +21.13% for VTHR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +12.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +13.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTHR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -34.6% for VTHR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while VTHR charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $6 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 1.23% for VTHR.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and VTHR share 469 holdings out of 2428 unique holdings combined, representing a 81.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or VTHR?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTHR charges 0.06%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or VTHR?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.63% vs +21.89% for VTHR, so VTHR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.56% vs +13.19% for VTHR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or VTHR?
VTHR has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs VTHR -34.6%.
Should I hold both VOO and VTHR?
VOO and VTHR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VTHR?
VOO and VTHR share 469 common holdings with a 81.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2428 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VTHR?
VOO yields 1.09% while VTHR yields 1.23%, so VTHR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.