VOO vs XNTK
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. XNTK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XNTK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $2.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.16% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 37 | |
| YTD Return | +14.27% | +31.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +49.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +38.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +18.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 26.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -76.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 25, 2000 |
VOO vs XNTK Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% while XNTK returned +49.38%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.27% versus a gain of 31.20% for XNTK.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.19% per year against +38.75% for XNTK; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +18.87% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XNTK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -76.3% for XNTK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XNTK charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 0.16% for XNTK.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XNTK share 31 holdings out of 510 unique holdings combined, representing a 30.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XNTK?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XNTK charges 0.35%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XNTK?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% vs +49.38% for XNTK, so XNTK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.59% vs +8.31% for XNTK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XNTK?
XNTK has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XNTK -76.3%.
Should I hold both VOO and XNTK?
VOO and XNTK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XNTK?
VOO and XNTK share 31 common holdings with a 30.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 510 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XNTK?
VOO yields 1.08% while XNTK yields 0.16%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.