VTI vs WDAI

VTI vs WDAI

Which is better, VTI or WDAI?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. WDAI is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: WDAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVTIWDAI
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.60%
AUM$666.9B$1M
Dividend Yield1.03%0.17%
Holdings3,543305
YTD Return+12.08%+12.49%Best
1Y Return+16.31%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.83%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.89%-
Top 10 Weight33.3%7.7%Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 24, 2001May 7, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VTI vs WDAI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VTI vs WDAI Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Pacer S&P World 3AI Top 300 ETF (WDAI) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, VTI is up 12.08% versus a gain of 12.49% for WDAI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VTI charges 0.03% per year while WDAI charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.17% for WDAI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in WDAI45.6%
WDAI already in VTI37.9%

45.6% of VTI's money is in holdings WDAI also owns. 37.9% of WDAI's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

86 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 295 in WDAI, against full books of 3,543 and 305.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 12 positions for WDAI that do not appear in our book for VTI (4.0% of the fund), and 1,065 for VTI that do not appear in WDAI (51.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VTIWeight in WDAIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp6.40%0.57%5.83%
AAPLApple, Inc6.29%0.57%5.72%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.79%0.57%4.22%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.65%0.31%3.34%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.90%0.35%2.55%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.56%0.51%2.05%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.31%0.26%2.05%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.70%0.54%1.16%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.29%0.58%0.71%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.08%0.53%0.55%

45.6% of VTI is already inside WDAI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VTIWDAI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VTI or WDAI?

VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDAI charges 0.60%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WDAI?

45.6% of VTI's money is in holdings WDAI also owns. 37.9% of WDAI's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 86 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 295 in WDAI.

Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WDAI?

VTI yields 1.03% while WDAI yields 0.17%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WDAI better than VTI?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. WDAI is less concentrated, with 7.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.