VTI vs WRND
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WRND delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WRND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $11M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.96% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 216 | |
| YTD Return | +13.86% | +16.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.74% | +26.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.66% | +22.52% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 17.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -27.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Feb 8, 2022 |
VTI vs WRND Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST. Over the past year VTI returned +20.74% while WRND returned +26.95%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.86% versus a gain of 16.96% for WRND.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.66% per year against +22.52% for WRND. Across the full 5-year window we track, WRND has the edge at +14.60% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WRND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -27.2% for WRND. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WRND charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.96% for WRND.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WRND share 69 holdings out of 2923 unique holdings combined, representing a 36.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WRND?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WRND charges 0.18%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WRND?
Over the past year VTI returned +20.74% vs +26.95% for WRND, so WRND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VTI annualized +8.11% vs +14.60% for WRND. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WRND?
WRND has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WRND -27.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and WRND?
VTI and WRND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WRND?
VTI and WRND share 69 common holdings with a 36.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2923 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WRND?
VTI yields 1.07% while WRND yields 0.96%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.