VTI vs WRND
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs NYLIM Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
Which is better, VTI or WRND?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WRND led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WRND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $11M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 0.90% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 209 |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +15.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.78% | +20.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.89% | +21.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.94% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.4%Best | -27.2% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $17,560 | $18,301Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | New York Life Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Feb 8, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (4.6 years).
VTI vs WRND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WRND Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and NYLIM Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) is an ETF from New York Life Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +16.78% while WRND returned +20.82%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.28% versus a gain of 15.21% for WRND.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +20.89% per year against +21.48% for WRND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WRND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.4% for VTI and -27.2% for WRND. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WRND charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 0.90% for WRND.
Holdings Overlap
39.8% of VTI's money is in holdings WRND also owns. 55.1% of WRND's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
79 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 202 in WRND, against full books of 3,543 and 209.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 8 positions for WRND that do not appear in our book for VTI (3.7% of the fund), and 1,071 for VTI that do not appear in WRND (57.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in WRND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.40% | 6.89% | 0.49% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.29% | 5.60% | 0.69% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.90% | 8.05% | 5.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.79% | 5.31% | 0.52% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.65% | 4.77% | 1.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.56% | 2.83% | 0.27% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.70% | 2.90% | 1.20% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.35% | 2.81% | 1.46% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.08% | 1.23% | 0.15% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.12% |
55.1% of WRND is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WRND?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WRND charges 0.18%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WRND?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.78% vs +20.82% for WRND, so WRND leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WRND?
WRND has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -22.4% vs WRND -27.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and WRND?
VTI and WRND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WRND?
55.1% of WRND's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 55.1% of WRND's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 79 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 202 in WRND.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WRND?
VTI yields 1.03% while WRND yields 0.90%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WRND better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WRND led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.