IVV vs WRND
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. WRND delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WRND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $10M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.92% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 216 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +18.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +29.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +22.39% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -27.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 8, 2022 |
IVV vs WRND Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NYLI Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while WRND returned +29.47%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 18.11% for WRND.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +22.39% for WRND. Across the full 5-year window we track, WRND has the edge at +14.99% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WRND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -27.2% for WRND. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WRND charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.92% for WRND.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WRND share 63 holdings out of 647 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WRND?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WRND charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WRND?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +29.47% for WRND, so WRND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +14.99% for WRND. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WRND?
WRND has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WRND -27.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and WRND?
IVV and WRND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WRND?
IVV and WRND share 63 common holdings with a 39.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 647 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WRND?
IVV yields 1.09% while WRND yields 0.92%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.